Заключение
Еще раз повторим, что феминистски ориентированная экономическая наука не является ни женской экономикой, которой занимаются исключительно женщины, ни феминной экономикой, в которой применяются только мягкие технические приемы и кооперативные модели.
По мнению феминистских исследователей, неявное отражение искаженного идеала «мужественности» в моделях, методах, темах и преподавании негативно отразилось на результатах исследований в экономической науке. Использование более полного диапазона инструментов исследований и преподавания на более широкой территории экономической деятельности позволило бы добиться и ученым-мужч инам, и ученым-женщи- нам более высоких научных результатов.Возможно, многие читатели пришли к выводу, что они уже сейчас так или иначе занимаются «феминистской экономической наукой». При этом они предпочли бы рассматривать себя как исследователей, просто занимающихся «хорошей экономикой». Если кто-то ощущает потребность в том, чтобы оградить свою работу от эпитета «феминистский», вероятно, полезно было бы выяснить источник этого дискомфорта. Возможно, такого рода защитная позиция отражает культурные убеждения относительно маскулинности и феминности, а также превосходства и неполноценности, которые следовало бы подвергнуть более тщательному изучению.
Литература
Беккер Гэри С. (2003). Человеческое поведение: экономический подход. M.: ГУ—ВШЭ.
Гоббс Томас (1989). Сочинения в двух томах. Т. I. M.: Мысль.
Лакофф Джордж и Марк Джонсон (2004). Метафоры, которыми мы живем. M.: Эдиториал УРСС.
Akerlof George A., and Janet L. Yellen (1988). Fairness and Unemployment // American Economic Review. May 78:2, 44-49.
Bakker Isabella (ed.) (1994). The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London, Zed Books.
Bartlett Robin L., and Susan F. Feiner (1992). Balancing the Economics Curriculum: Content, Method, and Pedagogy //American Economic Review.
May, 82:2, 559-564.Bartlett Robin L., and Paul King (1990). Teaching Economics as a Laboratory Science //Journal of Economic Education. Spring, 21, 181-193.
Becker Gary S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bell Carolyn Shaw (1974). Economics, Sex and Gender // Social Science Quarterly, 55:3, 615-631.
Benhabib Seyla (1987). The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilli- gan Controversy and Moral Theory // Meyers Diana, and Eva Feder Kittay (eds). Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield. P. 154-177.
Bergmann Barbara R. (1986). The Economic Emergence of Women. New York: Basic Books.
Bergmann Barbara R. (1987a). Measurement, or Finding Things Out in Economics // Journal of Economic Education. Spring, 18:2, 191-203.
Bergmann Barbara R. (1987b). The Task of a Feminist Economics: A More Equitable Future // Farnham Christie (ed.). The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. P. 131-147.
Bleier Ruth (1986). Sex Differences Research: Science or Belief? ^Bleier Ruth (ed.). Feminist Approaches to Science. New York, Pergamon Press. P. 147-164.
Blinder Alan S. (1991). Why Are Prices Sticky? Preliminary Results from an Interview Survey // American Economic Review. May, 81:2, 89-96.
Bordo Susan (1987). The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Coughlin Ellen K. (1993). Feminist Economists vs. „Economic Man“: Questioning a Field’s Bedrock Concepts // Chronicle of Higher Education. June 30, 39:43, A8-A9.
DeWald William G., Jerry G. Thursby, and Richard G. Anderson (1986). Replication in Empirical Economics //American Economic Review. September, 76:4, 587-603.
Easlea Brian, Witch Hunting (1980). Magic and the New Philosophy: An Introduction to Debates of the Scientific Revolution, /450-/750. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Ehrenberg Ronald G., and Robert S.
Smith (1994). Modem Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. 5th ed. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.England Paula (1992). Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
England Paula (1993). The Separative Self; Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions // Ferber Marianne A., and Julie A. Nelson (eds). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 37-53.
Ferber Marianne A. (1990). Gender and the Study of Economics //Saunders Phillip, and William B. Walstad (eds). The Principles of Economics Course: A Handbook for Instructors. New York, McGraw-Hill. P. 44-60.
Ferber Marianne A., and Julie A. Nelson (1993). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Folbre Nancy (1991). The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought // Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Spring, 16:3, 463-484.
Folbre Nancy (1994a). Who Paysfor the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. New York: Routledge.
Folbre Nancy (1994b). Domesticate the Gross Product //Dollars and Sense, March/ April, 192, 7.
Frank Robert H. (1988). Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.
Georgescu-Roegen Nicholas (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan Carol (1982). Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
GwartneyJames D., Richard Stroup, andJ.R. Clark (1985). Essentials of Economics. New York: Academic Press.
Hall Roberta M., and Bernice R. Sandler (1982). The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women. Washington D. C.: Association of American Colleges.
Harding Sandra (1986). The Science ζ/uestion in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Harding Sandra (1995). Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective? //
Feminist Economics, Spring, 1:1, 7-32.
Kahneman Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market // American Economic Review,, September, 76:4, 728-741.
Keller Evelyn Fox (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Keller Evelyn Fox (1986). How Gender Matters: Or, Why It’s So Hard for Us to Count Past Two // HardingJan (ed.). Perspectives on Gender and Science. London: Palmer Press. R 168-183.
Krueger Anne O., et al. (1991). Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics // Journal of Economic Literature, September, 29:3, 1035-1053.
LakofF George, and MarkJohnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin Lee B. (1995). Toward a Feminist, Post-Keynesian Theory of Investment: A Consideration of the Socially- and Emotionally-Constituted Nature of Agent Knowledge // Kuiper Edith, Jolande Sap, Susan Feiner, Notburga Ott, and Zafiris Tzan- natos (eds). Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
Longino Helen (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lucas Robert E., Jr. (1987). Models of Business Cycles. Oxford Basil Blackwell.
MansbridgeJane (1993). Feminism and Democratic Community // ChapmanJohn W., and Ian Shapiro (eds). Democratic Community: NOMOS XXXV. New York: New York University Press. P.339-395.
Mayer Thomas (1993). Truth vs. Precision in Economics. Brookfield. Vt.: Edward Elgar.
McCloskey Donald N. (1987). The Writing of Economics. New York: Macmillan.
McCloskey Donald N. (1993). Some Consequences of a Conjective Economics/7 Fer- ber Marianne A., and Julie A. Nelson (eds). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. R 69-93.
Merchant Carolyn (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific, Revolution. San Francisco Harper Sc Row.
NelsonJulie A. (1992). Gender, Metaphor and the Definition of Economics //Economics and Philosophy. Spring, 8:1, 103-125.
NelsonJulie A. (1993a). Household Equivalence Scales: Theory vs. Policy? //journal of Labor Economics. July, 11:3, 471-493.
Nelson Julie A. (1993b). The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics //Ferber Marianne A., and Julie A. Nelson (eds). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist. Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. R 23-36.
Nelson Julie A. (1996). Feminism, Objectivity, and Economics. London: Routledge.
Nussbaum Martha C., and Amartya Sen (eds) (1993). The (Quality of Life. Oxford Clarendon Press.
Renwick TrudiJ., and Barbara R. Bergmann (1993). ABudget-Based Definition of Poverty: With An Application to Single-Parent Families // Journal of Human Resources. Winter, 28:1, 1-24.
ShackelfordJean (1992). Feminist Pedagogy: A Means for Bringing Critical Thinking and Creativity to the Economics Classroom //American Economic Review. May, 82:2, 570-576.
Sen Amartya (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory // Philosophy and Public Affairs. Summer, 6, 317-344.
Sen Amartya (1985). Women, Technology, and Sexual Divisions // United Nation Conference on Trade and Development, Trade and Development: An UNCTAD Review, 6. R 195-223.
Sen Amartya (1992). Objectivity and Position. The Lindley Lecture, The University of Kansas.
Strassmann Diana L. (1993). Not a Free Market: The Rhetoric of Disciplinary Authority in Economics ^Ferber Marianne A., and Julie A. Nelson (eds). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 54-68.
Strassmann Diana L. (1994). Feminist Thought and Economics: Or, What do the Visigoths Know? //American Economic Review. May, 84:2, 153-158.
Strober Myra (1987). The Scope of Microeconomics: Implications for Economic Education // Journal of Economic Education. Spring, 18, 135-149.
Stmber Myra (1994). Rethinking Economics Through a Feminist Lens // Amencan Economic Review. May 1994, 84:2, 143-147.
Strober Myra, and Carolyn L. Arnold (1987). The Dynamics of Occupational Segregation among Bank Tellers! ^Brown Clair, and Joseph A. Pechman (eds). Gender and the Workplace. Washington D. C.: The Brookings Institution. P. 107-148.
Summers Lawrence H. (1991). TheScientific Illusion In Empirical Macroeconomics// Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93:1, 129-148.
Waring Marilyn (1988). IfWomen Counted: A New Feminist Economics. New York: Harper Sc Row.